Myth vs Reality of CAT Preparation

The Common Admission Test (CAT), conducted by the Indian Institutes of Management (IIMs), is a computer-based exam for admission to management programs. Each year, millions of aspirants aim for a spot in prestigious IIMs through CAT. However, misinformation surrounding the exam often complicates preparation decisions. Many MBA aspirants seek various sources of information before starting CAT preparation, but they encounter numerous myths and baseless facts during their study journey. In this article, we aim to debunk such myths and provide accurate information to help aspirants refine their preparation strategies for CAT.

Myth 1 : CAT is an extremely difficult exam to Crack

  • It is a widely held belief that the CAT exam is exceptionally challenging and hard to succeed in. However, it’s important to note that while CAT is indeed competitive, it’s not impossible. Everyone who has prepared for appearing in the cat exam to has even thought about is has definitely come across the statement. This prevailing notion can be highly demotivating for students, leading to self-doubt.. CAT is similar to any other exam that can be successfully conquered with thorough preparation. With dedicated preparation, strategic studying, and the right approach, many aspirants achieve success in the CAT exam every year. Therefore, labeling it as “extremely difficult” might not accurately reflect the actual experience and potential outcomes of candidates who approach the exam with diligence and determination.

Myth 2 : One needs to cover the Entire Syllabus to Crack the CAT

  • One prevalent myth surrounding the CAT exam is the belief that one needs to meticulously cover the entire syllabus to have a chance at cracking it. However, this is not necessarily true. While having a strong grasp of all topics can be beneficial, it’s not always feasible or practical within the limited preparation time. In reality, focusing on key concepts, mastering problem-solving techniques, and practicing time management are often more effective strategies. Quality preparation that targets core areas of the syllabus and emphasizes understanding and application rather than rote memorization can lead to success in the CAT exam. Therefore, candidates should prioritize depth over breadth in their preparation, focusing on mastering key topics and refining their test-taking skills for a better chance at achieving their desired score.

Myth 3 : It is Impossible to crack the CAT exam without Coaching

  • Many aspiring CAT candidates believe that coaching is an absolute necessity for success in the exam. However, this is a myth. While coaching can provide valuable guidance, strategies, and structured study plans, it is not the sole determinant of success. With the wealth of resources available online, including study materials, practice tests, and forums for discussion and doubt clarification, self-preparation is entirely feasible. Success in the CAT exam depends more on dedication, effective study techniques, and consistent practice rather than solely on coaching. Many self-prepared candidates have achieved excellent results through disciplined self-study, demonstrating that cracking the CAT without coaching is indeed possible.

Myth 4 : It is easier for Engineers to Crack the CAT Exam

  • There’s a common misconception that individuals with an engineering background have a natural advantage when it comes to cracking the CAT exam. However, this belief overlooks the diverse skill sets and backgrounds that contribute to success in the exam. While engineers may have strong quantitative reasoning abilities due to their academic training, the CAT exam evaluates a broad range of skills including verbal ability, logical reasoning, and data interpretation. Success in the CAT exam is determined more by a candidate’s overall aptitude, dedication to preparation, and effective study strategies rather than their academic background alone. Non-engineering candidates can perform exceptionally well with the right approach and diligent preparation. Therefore, it’s important to dispel the notion that engineers have an inherent advantage in cracking the CAT exam.

Myth 5 : Cracking CAT = IIM Admission

There’s a common misconception that achieving a high score in the CAT exam automatically leads to admission into one of the Indian Institutes of Management (IIMs). However, admission to the IIMs is a multifaceted process that involves more than just CAT scores. Other factors such as academic background, work experience, diversity, performance in group discussions and personal interviews, as well as overall profile strength, play crucial roles in the selection process. While a good CAT score is undoubtedly important and can open doors to the selection process, it does not guarantee admission. It’s essential for candidates to understand that admission to the IIMs is competitive and holistic, and success in CAT is just one step in the journey towards securing a seat in these prestigious institutions.

Myth 6 : Good English is a must for cracking CAT

There’s a misconception that strong English skills are indispensable for success in the CAT exam. While proficiency in English can be advantageous, especially in the verbal ability section, it is not the sole determinant of performance. The CAT exam evaluates various skills including quantitative aptitude, data interpretation, and logical reasoning, in addition to verbal ability. Candidates with weaker English skills can still excel in other sections and compensate for any deficiencies through diligent preparation and practice. Moreover, CAT offers accommodations such as vernacular language options and additional time for non-native English speakers, recognizing the diverse linguistic backgrounds of test-takers. Therefore, while English proficiency can be beneficial, it is not an absolute requirement for cracking the CAT exam.

Myth 7 : Experienced candidates receive more preference during Selection

There’s a common misconception that candidates with more work experience are favored over others during the selection process for CAT. While work experience can be an asset and may contribute positively to a candidate’s profile, selection decisions are typically based on an overall assessment of various factors. These include academic performance, CAT scores, diversity of background, extracurricular activities, and performance in group discussions and personal interviews. IIMs and other top B-schools seek to create diverse cohorts, comprising candidates from various backgrounds and experiences. Therefore, while work experience may be valued, it does not guarantee preferential treatment in the selection process. Each candidate is evaluated on their individual merits, and a balanced profile with relevant skills and achievements is more likely to be successful in the selection process, regardless of the extent of work experience.

Myth 8 : Candidates must answer all CAT questions to qualify for the Exam

There’s a misconception that in order to qualify for the CAT exam, candidates must answer every single question. However, this is not the case. The CAT exam does not have a penalty for unanswered questions. Instead, it employs a marking scheme where candidates earn points for correct answers and may face deductions for incorrect ones. Therefore, while attempting as many questions as possible is beneficial, especially for maximizing scores, leaving some questions unanswered does not disqualify a candidate from the exam. It’s important for candidates to focus on accuracy and efficiency in their attempts rather than attempting every question, as incorrect answers can lead to negative marking and lower overall scores.

Myth 8 : Quants is the toughest section of all three Sections

There’s a common misbelief that the Quantitative Aptitude (Quant) section of the CAT exam is the most challenging among all three sections. While Quantitative Aptitude may be perceived as difficult by some candidates due to its emphasis on mathematical concepts and problem-solving skills, the difficulty level of each section can vary depending on individual strengths and weaknesses. The CAT exam comprises three sections: Quantitative Aptitude, Verbal Ability and Reading Comprehension (VARC), and Data Interpretation and Logical Reasoning (DILR). Each section presents its own unique challenges, and candidates may find one section more challenging than the others based on their background and preparation. Therefore, it’s essential for candidates to assess their strengths and weaknesses objectively and allocate their preparation time accordingly, rather than assuming that one section is inherently tougher than the rest.

Myth 9 : Following the strategies of CAT toppers yields the Best Results

Although it’s tempting to mimic the strategies of successful CAT toppers, it’s crucial to understand that what works for one candidate may not work for another. CAT toppers often have unique strengths, study methods, and approaches that may not be universally applicable. Each candidate has their own learning style, strengths, and weaknesses. Therefore, blindly following the strategies of CAT toppers may not necessarily lead to the best results for every candidate. Instead, it’s important for aspirants to develop their own personalized study plans and strategies that align with their individual abilities and goals. Experimenting with different approaches, seeking guidance from mentors or coaches, and continuously adapting one’s study methods based on feedback and performance are key to achieving success in the CAT exam.

myth 10 : One to two years of preparation is considered best for Cracking CA

While one to two years of preparation is often recommended by many for CAT, there’s no one-size-fits-all approach to preparation duration. The optimal preparation timeframe can vary significantly depending on multiple factors like the individual’s starting point, academic background, familiarity with the exam format, and other commitments such as work or studies. Some candidates may require less time to prepare thoroughly, while others may benefit from a longer preparation period. It’s essential for aspirants to assess their own strengths, weaknesses, and circumstances to determine the most suitable preparation duration for them. Additionally, the quality of preparation and consistency in study efforts are more important than the duration alone. As such, focusing on efficient and effective study strategies, regardless of the timeframe, is key to success in the CAT exam.

Scroll to Top